Let's put the conflict of interest at the top: we run a free wellness provider directory, and we'd like good coaches in it. We take no fee from anyone — but wanting you here is still an interest, so read accordingly.
So you should read a post from us titled "should you join a platform" with appropriate suspicion. Which is exactly why this one is organized around the cases where the answer is no. If we can't be straight about when a platform is the wrong call, there's no reason to believe us about when it's the right one.
Coaching itself has decent evidence behind it — Theeboom and colleagues' 2014 meta-analysis found positive effects across performance, wellbeing, coping, and goal-directed self-regulation in workplace settings. That's not the question here. The question is narrower and more practical: should the work run through someone else's storefront?
What you're actually trading
Strip away the pitch decks and every platform is the same trade. They provide distribution — people who need a coach, finding you without you doing the finding. You pay in three currencies:
- Margin. A cut of every engagement, forever, not just the first one.
- Relationship ownership. Whose client is it? The answer determines what happens to your practice if you leave.
- Design control. Their pricing model, their messaging cadence, their nudges. Their incentives quietly shape how you practice.
Whether that trade is good depends almost entirely on which of those three you have in surplus and which you're short on. That's it. That's the analysis.
Four situations where a platform genuinely helps
You're early, and your referral flow is nothing. The hardest part of a new practice isn't coaching. It's the first twenty clients. Distribution you can't otherwise buy is worth real margin, and paying a percentage of something beats a larger share of an empty calendar.
Your specialty is narrow. If you coach a specific thing — career changes into a particular field, a life stage, a niche most people in your city have never heard of — geography is your enemy and search is your friend. Platforms aggregate exactly the demand a local practice can't reach.
You hate the business half. Some excellent coaches are genuinely bad at marketing themselves, and are never going to enjoy learning. Outsourcing acquisition to keep doing the work you're good at is a legitimate trade, not a failure.
You want to test a niche cheaply. Trying a new client population through a platform costs you a percentage. Trying it by rebuilding your site, positioning, and funnel costs you a quarter.
Four situations where it's the wrong move
You already have a referral engine. If clients arrive through past clients, a network, or a professional community, a platform is charging you for the one thing you already have. Pay for distribution when you need distribution.
Your name is the differentiator. Some practices are built on a specific reputation — a book, a talk circuit, a body of writing. Routing that through a marketplace where you're one tile in a directory dilutes the thing that makes you chooseable.
The relationship isn't portable. This is the one people discover late. If the terms mean you can't take a client with you when you leave, you're not renting distribution — you're building someone else's asset with your own hands. Ask directly. Get the answer in writing.
The rate math doesn't work. Run it before the emotion. Take rate against your actual rate, against the sessions you can realistically hold in a week. If the platform's cut turns a sustainable practice into a treadmill, no amount of pipeline fixes that.
The questions to ask any platform — ours included
Six of them. An honest platform answers these crisply. Vagueness is itself the answer, which is the same test we proposed for wellness apps and your data.
1. What's the take rate, and what specifically does it buy? Not "the platform." Name the things: payments, matching, scheduling, insurance, the client relationship, marketing spend.
2. Who owns the client relationship? If you leave, can you take the clients who found you there? Is there a non-solicit? For how long?
3. How does the platform make money from client behavior? This is the one most coaches skip, and it's the one that shapes your practice. Metered pricing — per message, per minute — means the platform's revenue depends on conversations continuing. That incentive doesn't stay in the billing system. It leaks into product nudges, into engagement design, and eventually into the texture of the coaching itself. What gets rewarded is engagement, not progress. Your client's interest, which is needing you less over time, points the opposite way from the meter. Ask this question of any platform that charges around the coaching relationship — and if the platform is free, ask the adjacent one: what does it get out of you being there, and are you comfortable with that answer?
4. What happens to client data? Your clients will type things into this platform they haven't said out loud. Where does it live, who can read it, is it used to train models, and can your client take it with them or delete it? You're vouching for whatever the answers are.
5. Is there exclusivity? Can you keep your private practice, your other platform, your own rates?
6. What happens if you're acquired? Terms are inherited by whoever buys the company. The policy that matters most is the next owner's.
Our answers, as far as we have them
Honesty requires we take our own test, and the honest report includes what isn't settled.
Our answers changed since the first draft of this post, and the change is the answer: NexTier is now a free wellness provider directory, not a paid marketplace. We built the subscription rail — monthly client subscriptions, a 20% platform fee — and deleted it before charging anyone, because question 3 convinced us of more than we intended: the safest revenue model around a coaching relationship turned out to be none. Listing is free, clients browse and message you free, and NexTier takes no fee in either direction. Our answer to question 1 is therefore “nothing and nothing”; to question 3, “we don't — our revenue is a Pro membership for AI features, unrelated to your practice.” Clients appear to you under a pseudonym with granular, revocable sharing consent.
Two things we still owe you straight: client portability terms are settled in spirit (arrangements you make off-platform are your own; we're not a party and take no cut) but the fine print of profile export is young — press us on it. And credentials on profiles are self-declared: we review applications by hand but don't verify licenses yet, and every profile says so.
What's open now is the Founding Provider waitlist on the providers page. Founding Providers are first into the directory and get genuine input into how the provider side gets built — an early-access identity, explicitly not a payment arrangement. That's the actual offer. No urgency, no countdown; the list will be there next month too.
The answer for a lot of you is no
If you're established, your referrals work, and your name carries the practice — don't join a platform. Ours included. You'd be paying for distribution you already generate, and the trade doesn't make sense.
That's not modesty. A marketplace full of coaches who joined because they didn't need it and left when they noticed is worse for everyone than a smaller one full of coaches for whom the trade actually works. If the eight-tier frame is useful to your practice, it's free, and it stays free whether or not you ever list anywhere.
—
This post is part of a series on personal development organized around what we call Maslow's extended hierarchy — our synthesis of his later work. Source: T. Theeboom, B. Beersma, A. E. M. van Vianen, "Does Coaching Work? A Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Coaching on Individual Level Outcomes in an Organizational Context" (Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(1), 2014). Disclosure: NexTier operates a free wellness provider directory (no fees in either direction; provider credentials self-declared and not verified). This post is educational content, not business or legal advice.